Atlanta Redux

The problems created by crime are so vast, and crimes are so numerous, and the arena of agencies created to address them are so dysfunctional and interwoven, that it is maddening to look at the police chiefs and the courts and the lawyers and the mayors and the prisons and the prisoners and the legislators and not just throw up your hands and say: “There’s nothing I can do.”

This type of despair is what drives us to crumple on the couch and switch on the Nancy Grace and pretend that what we are doing is watching somebody doing something real about “the problem of crime.”

No matter what people like Noam Chomsky and Susan Sontag might say, we don’t do this because we are primitive and bloodthirsty: we do this because we are civilized and victimized.

Also: exhausted.

Ever since I became the victim of a fairly horrifying crime, way back in 1986, I have been trying to “do something” about crime, not because of the few hours I spent at the mercy of a criminal, but because of everything I learned about him and the justice system afterwards.

Becoming a victim does strange, alienating things to people. In his 1996 memoir, My Dark Places, the crime writer James Ellroy more or less explains what made him turn out so odd by telling the story of the unsolved murder of his own mother in 1958, when he was ten. He’d nurtured that experience into an obsession with the murder of a young woman named Elizabeth Short – re-named The Black Dahlia to sell papers – and then his obsession with The Black Dahlia eventually led him back to try solving his own mother’s murder. This led to a disjointed trail of old clues and possible suspects – and then to limbo.

In 1977, a young woman named Terri Jentz was nearly murdered by an axe-wielding man who attacked her and her companion as they biked across Oregon. Jentz briefly became a minor celebrity. She spent the next several years fleeing from and re-approaching the crime, until she decided, like James Ellroy, to try to solve it. What she found when she entered the world of victims agitating for justice was quite the opposite of the”closure” she appeared to be seeking. She found broken people trying desperately to patch together clues about their loved ones’ deaths, confronting system after system where they were sometimes treated with more contempt than the killers and rapists they were trying to put away.

She also found her killer – “alleged killer” – quite easily. Everybody knew who he was. Her efforts to find him and put him away, documented in her extraordinary book, Strange Piece of Paradise, led to a brief sentence for the man on an unrelated crime, but it also led her back to the limbo of her own attack, and experience she she thought she was trying to escape.

After I joined the vast ranks of victims whose predator got away with the crime, my personal obsession manifested in keeping files on men (and, rarely, women) who got away with multiple rapes or rape-murders.  I started with my own assailant and moved on to others.  I kept tabs on my rapist as he strolled in and out of prison, raping elderly women in the same little area of Florida for a dozen more years before he finally received a life sentence for one of his crimes.

I expanded my files to state laws and statistics and DNA research and the predominance of pro-criminal sentiment in academia and the media. Most of what I found was utterly demoralizing. But I have to keep reminding myself that my rapist was finally put away on a life sentence (later overturned, but he’s still in prison) because a few haunted victims of other crimes had managed to beat their way to the state capitol in Tallahassee and force changes to the very laws that allowed my rapist to walk away from his first rape charge with nothing more than probation – in 1982.

Haunted victims forced changes to the sentencing codes.  They implemented three-strikes rules.  They insisted on funding for DNA databases.  They stopped judges from letting rapists plead down to non-sex crimes, or just send them for treatment, or just let them go.

When I started this blog, I imagined my focus would be national and issue-based (and I still intend it to be so).  But I immediately found myself back in my old neighborhood in Atlanta, watching with no small amount of amazement as thousands of activists there spontaneously came together to take on the whole ball of wax on crime – recidivism, sentencing, the courts — a fight I’d often felt I was fighting alone, in an increasingly claustrophobic room stuffed with unwieldy files.

Some of these Atlanta activists started meetings with a judge in Atlanta this week. I’ll let them speak for themselves about how it went. But I already know one thing: I think I speak with some authority when I say that the era of haunted crime victims wandering the landscape of the justice system, looking for justice alone, is over.

I feel less weird already. Thanks for that.

What Citizens in Atlanta Are Doing to Fight Back: Part 1

Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin, never one to shirk at the job of preserving her reputation, wrote recently in the AJC that people should not complain about things like violent home invasions because crime used to be worse in Atlanta. 

It’s an interesting argument.  And in many ways, she is right, if you think back to the early 1990’s, for example, when virtually nobody lived in downtown Atlanta.  Back then, the city’s business district cleared out so fast after 5 p.m. you’d think it was vampires renting all those abandoned lofts. 

I worked at the Georgia World Congress Center at the time, installing convention booths.  Sometimes we had to work overnight for one of the bigger trade shows, which meant leaving our cars in unattended lots.  On those nights, before we went to work, we’d take everything of value out of our truck cabs, pop our hoods, and remove our car batteries.  We’d bungee cord the batteries to our toolboxes and bring them into the building with us so that nobody would steal the batteries, or, even worse, damage the hood or break the car windows trying to steal them.  It costs more to replace a window or repair a jimmied hood than to replace a battery or some factory-installed radio.  So, in essence, we proactively stripped own cars before clocking in for a night of unloading trucks and laying carpet. 

Still, cars got messed up or stolen.  And the only reason more of us weren’t victimized was because a lot of my co-workers were tough construction workers: the crack-heads knew that not a few of them carried both guns and short fuses about people messing with their work trucks. 

I didn’t carry a gun.  So if I got off late from a shift and had to take the train after the people in suits had fled the city center, I would take my hammer out of my tool-bag and swing it around while I waited in the station.  I found that swinging a hammer worked a whole lot better at deterring unwanted attention than flashing a box-cutter or one of those keychain-sized, feminine-looking little cans of mace.  Who, after all, wants to approach a pissed-off looking, exhausted-looking woman covered in sawdust and carpet lint who is twiddling a hammer in her hands?

This was my version of stripping my own truck, as it were: I stripped away the normal parts of my appearance and imitated the crazies and criminals around me so they would think twice about stealing my tools or flashing their privates.  And it worked, to a degree: I only had tools stolen when I laid them down at work, and I got flashed mostly in the downtown library, where, of course, I wasn’t wielding a hammer. 

The one time I did get flashed on the train, I was carrying my law school books instead of my tools, which taught me a great deal, in retrospect.

So when Shirley Franklin says that Atlanta is safer now than it used to be, she is partially correct: with the huge influx of non-gun toting, non-hammer-wielding residents, and the leveling of many of the city’s toxic housing projects (hey, let’s send ‘em to Clayton!), and the rental of at least some downtown lofts to non-vampire tenants, Atlanta can say that (at least temporarily) it has finally ceased to be the frontier town it has, more or less, been since 1837.

Only, that isn’t really true, either.  What is true is that crime was really out of control then, and crime is really out of control now, but now there are many, many more residents who have the resources to demand that their lives not resemble some episode of Deadwood or The Wire.  [In a later post, I will talk more about crime statistics, but suffice to say that all statistics can be fiddled with; all crime is bad, and there’s lots of bad crime happening every day.]

No wonder the Mayor and the Chief of Police and the court bureaucracies and judges are reeling at the sight of this new activism.  Used to be, the only organized activism they ever dealt with was endless lawsuits by prisoner’s rights advocates who knew they could bankrupt the justice system and free prisoners by suing over every last little thing.  The media loved this, and even many elected and appointed officials loved this, because after the lawsuits (paid by taxpayers) were over, they could all hold press conferences together and announce that they were working to “improve conditions” in the jails, and line up to collect human rights awards they’d stack up on the windowsills of their offices.

Which had the added benefit of blocking their view of the scores of felons they were (and are) releasing out the back doors of our courthouses every single day.

So What’s Different About the Public’s Response to Crime Now?

Two things have changed.

One of them is the Internet.  The Internet is affecting citizen activism in all sorts of ways.  It is literally creating a new type of activist: somebody who can go to work all day and then get involved on their own time, in their own homes, rather than having to decide to choose between working in the ordinary world or descending full-time into the weird, corrupting, consumptive netherworld of politics and professional activism. 

This professionalizing of part-time activism is an extremely healthy development, because the old model of activism practically guaranteed that activists either lived in poverty or succumbed to the temptations of “professional activism” of the ACORN mold, where political favoritism and political power eventually ate away at even those with the best of intentions. 

The Internet allows this new generation of activists to be ACTUALLY un-bossed and un-bought.  And as I keep saying, watch out for us old-timers.  Even many of us who started out meaning well have been bossed and bought to death.  Not that activism doesn’t take money, or that the government and elected officials can’t solve problems – but when there’s a wider range of people involved in fighting crime, they can only provide more checks and balances on each other.  The Internet really is democratizing anti-crime activism.      

The Internet is like CompStat for citizens.  It allows ordinary citizens from all over the city see what is going on in other neighborhoods.  It allows them to compile records of crime in entirely new ways.  Now, when neighborhood activists approach elected officials and police bureaucrats, they are not completely at the mercy of statistics that have been intentionally manipulated to downplay crime.  I think some of precinct commanders actually appreciate this, and I know that many cops on the street are welcoming these new activists.  For a long time, in Atlanta, and in many other cities, both the beat cops and the public have been at the mercy of bureaucrats who are motivated only to deny and ignore crime.

The other thing that has changed about the public’s response to crime is that people have simply stopped listening to the old excuses about criminals being mere victims of circumstance.  These excuses are made endlessly by academicians and mainstream journalists, and the politicians and police bureaucrats in cahoots with them.  But people are tired of hearing the same old excuses when their neighbors get roughed up and they can’t sleep at night. 

This has to do with the Internet, too, because now ordinary citizens can share information, rather than opening up the morning paper and reading one story after another written by somebody whose mission in life is to humanize predators, hide the failings of the criminal justice system to put predators away, and accuse anti-crime activists of being “vigilantes.” 

On a recent trip to Atlanta, I met several of the new anti-crime activists, and they are the farthest things from hothead vigilantes that anyone could imagine.  These new activists, many of them also new residents of Atlanta, are simply refusing to accept the type of lifestyle that used to mean taking your car battery out of your car when you went to work or sitting in an empty train car swinging a hammer, or trying not to be “insensitive” while the fifteen kids in your neighbor’s household grow up without parenting until they age out of the juvenile system into the adult one – the only graduation they’ll ever know.

These new activists are changing Atlanta, and they’re doing it while refusing to behave as if their flat-screen TVs and personal safety and peace of mind are the normal price to pay for living in a city.  It’s time for the Chief of Police and the Mayor to stop fighting them and start listening. 

Next: Recommendations for the Courts


The Anatomy of Yet Another Unnecessary Murder: How the Justice System Failed Eugenia Calle and Is Failing Us All


What follows is a preliminary effort to piece together Shamal (aka Jamal) Thompson’s long and troubling journey through Georgia’s broken criminal justice system prior to February 17, 2009, the day he murdered* an innocent cancer researcher named Eugenia Calle.  Ten months earlier, a DeKalb County Superior Court Judge named Cynthia J. Becker let Thompson walk free from what should have been a ten-year sentence for burglary.  She did so on the grounds that he was a first-time offender.  

He was not.

I gathered the records of Thompson’s many other criminal charges and pleas merely through Internet searches and a few phone calls to court clerks in Fulton, DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties in Georgia.  These counties and jurisdictions vary quite significantly in their commitment to making public safety information available to the public.  Fulton County’s public records system is almost uniquely shameful in comparison to similar courts throughout the country, while DeKalb County’s records are impressively detailed and easy to access on-line. 

This information is preliminary, based only on a few phone calls and web searches.  If you choose to reproduce or quote this article, please understand that I am unable to guarantee its absolute accuracy at this point.  Court records themselves often contain errors, and I can only reproduce what is entered on-line by the courts.  However, I include the public records case numbers for every case I cite, and if anyone involved in the justice system (or not) wishes to offer corrections or add to this account, please contact me through this website.

Why Didn’t Judge Cynthia Becker Do What I Did?

I am not a lawyer.  I don’t even live in Georgia anymore, though I lived in southeast Atlanta for twenty years.  Yet I managed to look up Shamal Thompson’s criminal history while sitting at a computer in Florida.  From 500 miles away, with no press credentials or official status or legal secretary or law clerk, I was able to easily discover what several judges in Georgia apparently did not care enough to find out: Shamal Thompson was no “first-time offender,” or mere “troubled kid” when he strolled into courtrooms throughout Metro Atlanta and was repeatedly given a slap on the wrist and a fourth, or tenth, second chance.  He was no first-time offender when he strolled into Eugenia Calle’s condominium and beat her to death on Tuesday.  

He was clearly no first-time offender in 2006, when he walked away from felony charges of aggravated assault in DeKalb County after the ADA declined to present the case against him to the Grand Jury (DeKalb County on-line Judicial System, #D0170113).  He was no first-time offender in 2007, when State Court of Fulton County Judge John Mather let him take a plea on theft-by-taking (State Court of Fulton County #06CR314782).  And he was certainly no first-time offender ten months ago, when DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Cynthia J. Becker let him walk out of prison with time served on a ten-year sentence for Burglary that she chose to reduce to a six-month “first offender” sentence, and then reduced, even more, to time served (DeKalb County On-Line Judicial System #07CR3936).  

How does ten years become six months become time served?  How does somebody who has bonded out of several courts and been charged with multiple crimes multiple times keep getting defined as a “first-time offender?”  Why do judges keep releasing him, and DAs keep declining to prosecute him?  How many innocent people have to die before we acknowledge that our courts are so de-funded and functionally broken that predators have little or nothing to fear from being arrested over and over and over again?  

How many people have to die before we say that we’ve had enough?

Here is the burglary sentence delivered to Shamal Jerome Thompson on April 3, 2008 in a courtroom in DeKalb County, Georgia.  Think of it as Eugenia Calle’s death sentence:

Docket Text Details
Case ID   07CR3936      
Description   Sentence      
Docket Filing Date   03-APR-2008      
Associated Party   SHAMAL JEROME THOMPSON      

Why did Judge Becker give Thompson First Offender status?  His adult record stretches back virtually to the day he ceased being a juvenile, which certainly suggests that he committed crimes that we, the public, cannot even know about before he turned 18.  And why, once again, was I able to find these things on-line, hundreds of miles away, while the courts in Atlanta kept letting Shamal Thompson back onto the streets?  

WSB Atlanta offers some truly gut-wrenching insight into what Judge Becker was using her Internet for when she should have been looking into Thompson’s criminal history before sentencing him on those burglary charges. She was looking at the bridal gown website Thompson claimed to have designed.  According to WSB (and WSB was the only news station that reported this), “Judge Becker cited the Web site and the ‘beautiful designs’ on the site as part of the reason for the light sentence she gave Thompson in the burglary case.”

Let’s take a moment to let that sink in.

Perhaps because I wasn’t busy looking at bridal gowns, what I found on-line about Shamal Thompson had less to do with taffeta than serial identity theft.  And fraud.  Little clues that should have led the Judge to ask herself: “Is this guy even telling me the truth when he tells me he’s a bridal fashion designer?”  Cynthia Becker needs to resign, out of embarrassment if not some deeper comprehension of the grotesquely ironic lack of judgment she displayed. 

Am I the only person who thinks Cynthia Becker needs to quit her day job? Well, here’s a good way for you to decide.  Because DeKalb County keeps such stellar on-line records, you can actually go to their website, the Online Judicial System of DeKalb County.  

Go to Shamal Thompson’s case, #07CR3936, and you will see a list of documents – a case docket.  Some of the documents are on-line, and some, like the court transcripts, aren’t on-line, but you can go to the court and request to see those.  Or pick some other offender – someone who has been terrorizing your neighborhood, or someone who has been in and out of the courts, or another of Becker’s cases.  Take a look at the dockets and think about all of the money we’re wasting on truly baroque and foolish things, while the crimes themselves – the point of the courts – seem to literally disappear in the endless processing and pleading and not prosecuting, or “nolle prosequi.”  

Nolle prosequi can occur because nobody had the resources to even investigate the case, or because there are too many defendants, or too many crimes, or because the public has become so gob-smacked with the idea that they are freeing innocent men that it is practically impossible to get most people put away anymore.  Nolle prosequi might as well be translated: we’re losing this game every day.

And don’t expect critical news about the broken court system from the daily paper.  They run personality pieces on criminals and mash notes about defense attorneys and never, ever, challenge judges.  The AJC hasn’t done a substantive series questioning sentencing in the courts since 1993.  They’ll go after the police, and some of the time when they do they should, but the courts get treated with real kid gloves.      

So I encourage you to go to the courthouse and see how things work.  But please remember, court clerks are busy people.  The good ones rank among the un-noticed heroes of our dysfunctional courts.  They don’t get the cushy no-show jobs like Juanita Hicks, former Fulton County Clerk of Court, who appointed her crony, Cathelene Robinson, who then turned around and paid Juanita to “write a history of the Clerk’s Office,” which Hicks of course, didn’t get around to writing.  

But she did take the money, which is just one reason why Fulton County says it can’t afford to put criminal records on-line, so you can’t go on-line and find information about the dirt-bag who just kicked in your back door. 

Just remember that when you’re standing in the hallway of the courthouse with a paper in your hand on which Judge Cynthia Becker prattles on about Shamal Thompson’s design skills: it wasn’t the clerk behind the counter who let Thompson walk out the door you’re about to walk out through.  The clerk behind the counter probably would have thrown him in prison, where he belonged.      

Who is Shamal Thompson?

I know nothing of Thompson’s life story.  For that type of “color coverage,” you’ll have to wait for the AJC to run long, plaintive stories about his difficult youth.  Meanwhile, here is what I was able to find out about Shamal Thompson’s crimes and history, so far:

Thompson was born either on 3/11/86 or 11/3/86, and he may well have used different birthdates, as well as different names, to avoid detection of his other crimes.  Of course, with technology like the In-ter-net, and fingerprint databases, such simple ploys should not have worked at all.  Did they?  Interesting question.

On May 18, 2005, a warrant was issued for Thompson in Gwinnett County on the charge of theft by receiving stolen property (#05W-17152).  It would be two years before the courts addressed these charges.  He also apparently committed an act of theft on December 9, 2005 (#06CR314782).  The information I received was confusing, but the State Court of Fulton County wouldn’t address those charges, either, until 2007. 

Meanwhile, on September 28, 2005, Thompson was arrested in DeKalb County.  He was released on October 5.  Charges included felony aggravated assault, fleeing/attempt to elude, and reckless driving.   Eight months later, on July 25, 2006, an Assistant District Attorney declined to present the case to a Grand Jury in DeKalb, and Thompson walked (#D0170113, or use the name Shamal Thompson, and be sure to hit the “all” button on the “case status” prompt). 

Why did the ADA decline to go forward with the case?  Why didn’t the jurisdictions of Gwinnett and DeKalb communicate with each other and deliver Thompson to Gwinnett to face his outstanding warrant there? 

In any case, on August 26, 2006 (note, we’re up to 2006 now – the dates get confusing: there’s so many of them), Thompson committed a felony burglary in DeKalb County.  He was arrested and spent five days in jail – from September 30 to October 4, 2006.  This case wouldn’t reappear until 2008, in Judge Becker’s court.  

About ten weeks later, December 5, 2006, Thompson was in trouble again, this time in the State Court of Fulton County.  I have little information on this case, and the on-line database from the State Court of Fulton County is ridiculously unusable.  The charge was forgery-in-the-first-degree; Thompson was the second defendant in the case, and it is “still open,” according to a helpful clerk on the phone.  The case number is #06CP5770.     

Next, on or around December 18, 2006, Thompson was either charged with theft-of-services and identity fraud or appeared in court on those charges.  Again, the information I have is confusing, but the clerk told me that the case is still open; the “last court date scheduled for it was January 2, 2007; and that the Fulton DA “hasn’t scheduled another court date.”  The case number is #06CP60870.  

All of this could be made clear to us on-line, of course, if there were any functioning leadership at the Clerk of Court during the expensive and ruinous years of Juanita Hicks and Cathelene Robinson.  

The next day, December 19, 2006, Thompson had 11 counts of identity fraud “dismissed at jail.”  Whatever that means.  It could be that some overworked cop didn’t show up, or didn’t show up the sixth time, after Thompson’s defense attorney managed to spin the date a half-dozen times before.  It could mean some paperwork disappeared.  Or was disappeared.  It could be that the overworked DA’s office couldn’t cope, that the case seemed insignificant compared to the thousands of others they were investigating and preparing.  In any case, in case #06CP60926, Thompson walked out the door.  Free again.

For forty days, at least.  On January 30, 2007, the State Court of Fulton County got around to addressing Thompson’s 12/9/2005 theft charge.  Judge John Mather accepted a plea, and Thompson walked.  The case number is #06CR314782.  

It would be great if somebody in Atlanta would go to the State Court of Fulton County and take a look at Judge Mather’s sentence and any other materials related to the case.  For if Thompson accepted a plea, why is it that Judge Becker gave him a first-time offender’s break, and Judge Michael Clark (we’ll get to him next) simply dropped charges against him and let him walk?  

Onward and upward.  On April 23, 2007, Judge Michael Clark of the Gwinnett Superior Court cut Thompson a deal: in exchange for Thompson pleading guilty to theft by receiving, Clark dropped another charge of theft by taking and gave him five years probation — as a first offender.  Case #06-B-02474-4, Gwinnett Courts.  

Questions arise.  If Thompson pleaded guilty on January 30, 2007, why did he get to plead guilty, again, as a first offender, some seven weeks later?  For that matter, had Judge Mather give him a first-offender deal, too, those seven weeks prior to his second first-offender plea, despite his juvenile record, if it exists, and all the other confirmed charges floating around?  The head swims.  But, then again, I’m sitting here in Florida, getting paid nothing to watch the dolphins cavort, dreaming of crime victims.  

I’m not some judge in her chambers in DeKalb County getting paid to enforce the law.  Dreaming of wedding gowns.

Some time around February 11, 2008, Shamal Thompson was back in jail again in DeKalb County, where he stayed until April 3, when he convinced Judge Cynthia J. Becker that his bridal gown web design skills entitled him to a third first-offender sentence, a further reduction in that sentence, and immediate release with time served, justice be damned.  

And 319 days later it was, wasn’t it?  

What Will Happen Now?

What will happen now is that Shamal Thompson has just bought himself (on our tab) a very expensive and high-profile defense team who will use our money to accuse us as a society of failing this talented /troubled/ mentally unstable/ promising/ neglected/ sensitive/ misunderstood young man while using every trick they’ve embedded in the criminal justice system to try to get him off again as they grandstand to enhance their public personas while lining their pockets and wailing that they do all this in order to defend justice from its enemies.

Lapdogs in the daily press will breathlessly report this.

Eugenia Calle’s family and loved ones will bury her body and remember all the good she did while she was alive.

Her colleagues will go back to trying to cure cancer. 

Who Was That Who Saw it Coming? 

In 2005, a writer named Coley Ward published a startling article in Atlanta’s Creative Loafing.  Called “Case Dismissed: Accused Felons Often Are Released When Officers Fail to Testify,” Ward interviewed Fulton County Magistrate Judge Richard Hicks, who complained that more than half of the felony cases scheduled in his courtroom had to be dismissed, usually when police officers didn’t show up to testify.  The police argued back that they didn’t always receive subpoenas in time, or that they were on duty elsewhere or off the clock – working for free.  DA Paul Howard (whose own staff is stretched beyond human means) argued that most of those felons eventually got re-arrested for something else and thus indicted, an argument Judge Hicks called statistically untrue.  Even if it were true, Coley Ward points out, what type of system lets out half its felons, or more, on the grounds that they’ll be back again soon?  

Everybody agreed on one thing, though: the justice system is so broken that the chance of a felon even getting indicted once he has been caught, if he is caught, is so small in Fulton County that it hardly seems worth worrying about.

Now picture Shamal Thompson boldly strolling through Dr. Eugenia Calle’s condominium lobby, trying to get back into her apartment, where he knew her body lay, after killing her and going on a cold-blooded shopping spree with her credit card.  No consequences.  No fear.  

We should have all seen it coming.  Thompson appears before Judge Richard Hicks on March 3, four years after Hicks pulled the fire alarm on his own courthouse.  

And the Mayor and the Chief of Police continue to say that there’s no problem, that it’s all in people’s heads, that crime is down. 

I once had a defense attorney say: “Geez, you take this stuff so personally.”  Well, I’m a victim of violent crime, and so is my husband and many, many of my friends in Atlanta.  I matriculated from Emory University’s Graduate School, and as a public health worker and lobbyist, I occasionally worked with the epidemiologists, including those involved in seeking the links between hormones and cancer that defined Eugenie Calle’s research (I never met her).  My dear friend, Toni, lost her life to cancer two years ago.  Another dear friend and mentor, Vicki, has been fighting breast cancer for years.  I lost a beloved male friend suddenly to cancer last year. And since Christmas, my mother has been waging a valiant fight against late-stage lung and brain cancer.  

So, yeah.  As someone who prays daily for those gone to cancer and those fighting it now, I take the loss of a brilliant and dedicated cancer researcher personally.  God rest.  

As a crime victim, I take crime personally.     

As an Emory alum, I take their community’s safety personally, and I would expect all members of the campus, even those faculty of the offender-besotted-ilk, to take the murder of a member of their community seriously.  

As a woman, I take the vulnerability of women personally.  As a former Atlantan who worked hard to make the city a safer place for women and children, I take crime in Atlanta seriously.  

It’s up to us – black and white, neighbor by neighbor by neighbor, to come together to demand that criminals be removed from the streets.  Permanently.  The only way to break the cycle of violence — to save the younger brothers and sisters of all the Shamal Thompsons out there, is to change what the courts have been doing for the last thirty years.  

Stop letting the predators out.  All of them.  

Start prosecuting crimes.  All of them.        

Start telling us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about what is happening in our courts.  They are the problem.  And that is what this blog will be about.  

I am so, so sorry for Eugenia Calle and for the people who loved her.  

Tomorrow: What citizens in Atlanta are doing to fight crime and monitor the courts.

*Of course, Thompson has not yet been convicted of the crime.